Email this article 
Hide
Show all
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family and Friends Textbooks: Representation of Genderism
Abstract
The present study employed a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach to investigate the linguistic representation of male and female social actors in Family and Friends 4, 5 and 6. To this end, van Leeuwen’s (1996) representational framework and Halliday and Matthiessen’s (2004) Transitivity Theory Model were adopted to reveal the ideology behind the constructions. The findings indicated a “sexist attitude” in favor of male social actors in which males were portrayed more than females and also had high activity. In addition, it was revealed that there was attempt to avoid traditional stereotypes of females in most parts of textbooks and women were not portrayed at home as housewives engaged in child care, however, it can be claimed that they suffered most obviously from low visibility. The findings may help EFL teachers, material developers and policy makers to be aware of equality/inequality issues in textbooks in order to make an equality perspective to learners.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Babaii, E., & Ansary, H. (2005). On the effect of disciplinary variation on transitivity: The case of academic book reviews. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3), 113-126.
Baghdadi, M. (2012). A comparision of gender representation in English (EFL) and Arabic (AFL) textbooks in Iran: A critical discourse analysis. A Thesis Presented to the Department of Linguistics, California State University, Long Beach.
Cameron, D. (1990). The feminist critique of language: A reader. London: Rutledge.
Coles, G. (1977). Dick and Jane grow up: Ideology in adult basic education readers. Urban Education, 12(1), 37-53.
Gershuny, H. L. (1977). Sexism in dictionaries and texts: Omissions and commissions in Nilsen, A.P. et al. Sexism and language (pp. 143-159). Urbana, Ill: the National Council of Teachers of English.
Dominguez, L.M. (2003). Gender textbook evaluation. TESL Canada Journal, 8(1), 32-46.
Ghalajian Moghaddam, H. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of Iranian first, second, and third grade high school English textbooks. World Science Publisher, United States, 2(1), 110-119.
Halberg, R. (2006). Text matters: A study of gender in a contemporary text for English. University essay Retrieved 23 August 2014 from: http://www.essays.se/essay/0fc0984b2f/
Hall, M. (2014). Gender representation in current EFL textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2) 253-261.
Halliday, M. A. K & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar: 3rd Edition. London: Arnold.
Hamdan, S. (2010). English¬language textbooks reflect gender bias: A case study in Jordan. Advances in Gender and Education 2, 22-¬26.
Kemp, J. E. (1977). Instructional design: A plan for unit and course development (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Mirza, M., Keynan, H. Kakhar-ud-din (2004) Gender analysis of school curriculum and textbooks. United Nations Educational, Scientific and cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Mustapha, A. (2014). Sex roles in English language textbooks in Nigerian schools. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(2), 69-81
Mustedanagic, A. (2010). Gender in English language and EFL textbooks. A term paper submitted to Halmstad University. Hogskola.
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors in disourse. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R, & Coulthard, M. (Eds.), Text and Practices, London: Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yang, C. C. R. (2014). Gender representation in Hong Kong primary English language textbooks: a study of two widely-used textbook series. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.55
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.