Email this article 
Hide
Show all
The Metaphors on International Intervention: A Discourse Analysis of the Sri Lankan English Newspaper Editorials
Abstract
The metaphors used in the Sri Lankan English newspaper editorials during the peace talk time (2001-2007) commenting on the international intervention in the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict reveal community based ideological and attitudinal positions of the newspapers published in Sri Lanka. Metaphors literally contribute to our understanding of reality. The frames and scripts used for legitimization and de-legitimization of the issues related to international intervention and facilitation in the peace talk, peace process and monitoring the ceasefire bring out certain realities comfortable to certain people, groups or communities. The binary positions projected in the editorial discourse are identified. Discourse constitutes power in constructing ideational, textual and interpersonal constructs which are ideological. It can transmit and even legitimize power in society. During the peace talk time, the editorials are expected to develop constructive discourse on conflict intervention and resolution to make a positive impact on legislative changes but they display ‘ethno-nationalist’ tendencies. The study analyzes whether the media has been a part of the problem or a part of the solution. Since newspaper and editorial discourses are the constructions of journalists and editors of the elites, the biased ideologies are “hidden or subtle in expressions and often revealed in mild forms”. This study takes up selected editorials of the Sri Lankan English newspapers which appeared mainly during the Memorandum of Understanding between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eezham during that period, to relate the discourse themes with rhetorical and metaphorical features.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abeyasekara, A. (2002). Colors of the Robe: Religion, Identity and Difference. Colombia: University of South Carolina Press.
Balachanddran, P.K. (1999). Buddhist Monks feel the heat for theory of Hindu-Muslim take over of Lanka,” Hindustan Times, August 30. 1999: Delhi.
Bartholomeusz, T. J. (2002). In Defence of Dharma: Just-War Ideology in Buddhist Sri Lanka. London: Routledge Curzon.
Bartholomeusz, T. J., and Chandra R. de Silva. (1998).Buddhist fundamentalism and identity in Sri Lanka. In Bartholomeusz, Tessa J., and Chandra R. de Silva, eds. 1998. Buddhist Fundamentalism and Minority Identities in Sri Lanka. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. (2002). The Problem. A Geopolitics of Academic Writing: Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. p.7.
Chilton, P.A (1996) Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York. Washington. DC/Baltimore. Bern. Frankfurt am Main. Berlin. Vienna. Paris: Peter Lang
Chilton, P. and Ilyin M. (1993) Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the "common european house”. Discourse and Society. Vol.4/1, London: Sage.
Chilton, P. and Lakoff G. (1995) Foreign policy by metaphor in Schaffner C. and Wenden A.L’ (Eds), Language and Peace.Hants, Vermont: Dartmouth
Chilton, P. and Schaffner C (1997) Discourse and Politics in van Dijk T.A (Ed). Discourse as social Interaction. London, California, New Delhi: Sage.
de Silva, Chandra R. (2006). Buddhist monks and peace in Sri Lanka. In Deegalle, ed. Buddhism, Conflict and Violence in Modern Sri Lanka. London: Routledge.
Devotta, Neil. (2004a). Sri Lanka: Ethnic domination, violence and illiberal democracy. In Alagappa, Muthiah, ed. 2004. Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Connecting Democratic Space. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Devotta, Neil. (2004b).Blowback: Linguistic Nationalism, Institutional Decay and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Devotta, Neil. (2007). Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology: Conflict Resolution in Sri Lanka. Policy Studies 40: Washington: East West Centre. Retrieved May 13, 2007, from http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/stored/pdfs/ps040.pdf
Dharmadasa, K.N.O. (1992). Language, Religion, and Ethnic Assertiveness: The Growth of Sinhala Nationalism in Sri Lanka. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Fairclough, N. (1989): Language and Power, Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995): Ideology and identity Change in political television. In Fairclough, N., Critical Discourse Analysis, Longman.
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111-137. Soeul: Hanshin.
Fowler R (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press.
London and New York: Routledge
Gamson, W.A. (1992). Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gans, Chaim (2003) The Limits of Nationalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding: Cambridge.
Goodhand, J., Klem, B., Fonseka, D., Keethaponcalan, S.I, and Sardesai, S. (2005) Aid, Conflict, and Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka 2000 – 2005, Colombo: The Asia Foundation.
Gunawardena, R.A.L.H. (1990). The people of the lion: The Sinhala identity and ideology in the history and historiography. In Spencer Jonathan, ed. 1990. Sri Lanka: the History and the roots of Conflict. London: Routledge.
Hariharan, R. (2008). War, peace & relations across palk straits. Features, the Island, Retrieved August 23, 2008, from
Hariharan, R. (2008b). Sri Lanka: Understanding each other’s ‘concerns’. An article published in The Island newspaper on October, 15 2008. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://www.island.lk/2008/10/15/features1.html
Hennayake, S. K. (1989). The Peace Accord and the Tamils in Sri Lanka. Asian Survey 29, no. 4
Johnson, Eric (2005). Proposition 203: A Critical Metaphor Analysis. Bilingual Research Journal, 29: 1 Spring 2005. Arizona State University. Retrieved November 03, 2007, from http://brj.asu.edu/content/vol29_no1/art4.pdf
Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kearney, R. N. (1967).Communalism and Language in the Politics of Ceylon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Lakoff G. and Johnson M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press
Little, David. (1994). Sri Lanka: The Invention of Enemy. Series on Religion, Nationalism and Intolerance. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The Post-modern Conditions: a Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Quoted in Suresh. A. Canagarajah’s (1999)Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manor, James. (1994). Organizational Weakness and the Rise of Buddhist Extremism. In Marty, Martin E., and R. Scott Appelby eds. 1994. Accounting for Fundamentalism: The Dynamic Character of Movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mio, J. S. (1997): Metaphor and Politics, in: Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 12 (2), 113-133.
Musolff, A. (2004): Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke, New York.
Obeyesekere, G.(1970). Religious symbolism and political change in Ceylon. Modern Ceylon studies 1:43-63.
Orwell, G. (1968). Politics and the English language, in: George Orwell: The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell. In Front of Your Nose: 1945-1950, Sonia Orwell/Ian Angus (ed.), vol. 4, London, 127-140.
Ponambalam, S. (1983). Srilanka: The National Question and the Tamil Liberation struggle. London: Zed Books. Retrieved September 18, 2007, from http://www.tamilnation.org/books/Eelam/satchi_ponnambalam.htm#1.3_The_National_Question_
Ross, S. D. (2002). An American frame: New York Times editorial discourse on Palestine and Israel. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://www.portalcomunicacion.com/bcn2002/n_eng/programme/prog_ind/papers/d/pdf/d003_dente.pdf
Ross, S. D. & Bantimaroudis, P. (2006). Frame shifts and catastrophic events: The attacks of September 11, 2001, and New York Times's portrayals of Arafat and Sharon. Mass Communication & Society 2006, Vol. 9, No. 1, Pages 85-101.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Schank. R. (1998). Tell Me A Story: Narrative and Intelligence: Northwestern University Press
Schiffrin, D. (2002). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, England: Blackwell
Smith, B. L. (1978). Religion and legitimation of Power in Srilanka. Chambersburg, PA:Anima Books.
Sopory, P. & James P. D. (2002):The Persuasive effects of metaphor. A meta-analysis, in: Human Communication Research,28 (3), 382-419.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995): Relevance. Communication and Cognition, 2. Aufl., Malden, Oxford.
Tambiah, S. J. (1986). Srilanka: Ethnic Fratricide and the Dismantling of Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Uyangoda, J. (1996). Militarization,Violent State, Violent society: Srilanka. In Rupesinghe, Kumar and Khawar Mamtaz eds.(1996). Internal Conflicts in South Asia. London: Sage Publications.
van Dijk, T. (ed.) 1985. Handbook of discourse analysis, 4 vols, Academic Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995a). Power and the news media. In D. Paletz (Ed.), Political Communication and Action. (pp. 9-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995b). Ideological Discourse Analysis. New Courant (English Dept, University of Helsinki), 4 (1995), 135-161. Special issue Interdisciplinary approaches to Discourse Analysis , ed. by Eija Ventola and Anna Solin.
van Dijk, T. (1995c). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and pace (pp. 17-33). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
van Dijk, T.A. (1998). News as Discourse. New Jersey, Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbawn
Werth P. (1999) Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Essex, New York: Pearson
Wilson,A. J. ( 2000). Srilankan Tamil Nationalism: Its origins and Developments in the Nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. Vancouver: University of British Colombia press.
Wodak, R. (1989). Language, power and ideology. Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.21
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.