Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Syntactic Functions of Infinitives in English
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of the most relevant syntactic functions of infinitives within the sentence in English, based on the British 2006 Corpus (BE06) designed by Paul Baker and displayed by the server of Andrew Hardie, Corpus Query Processor (CQPweb). The corpus reveals that infinitives are a very frequent non-finite form employed in English. The most relevant syntactic functions that infinitives took in the corpus were as verbal periphrasis, as verb complements, as noun complements, as adjectival complements, as nominal predicates and as verb subjects. In English there are specific contexts in which the infinitive is not preceded by the particle to, such as after an extensive number of auxiliary, perception and permission verbs. Furthermore, there are other specific contexts in which the infinitive is preceded by the particle to, such as after a large number of direct objects in transitive verbs and functioning as a verb subject and as a noun or adjective complement. The major claim of this study is that infinitives in English do not constitute a uniform group; in fact, they display a variety of syntactic functions within the sentence directly reflecting their nominal and verbal properties.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barron, J. (2000). The morphosyntactic correlates of finiteness. Proceedings of the LFG00 Conference. http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/5/lfg00barron.pdf
Baker, P. (2009). The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 312-337.
Buridant, C. (1990). L’infinitif dans les langues romanes et las langues germaniques: essai d’approche typologique. In: Bechert, Bernini & Buridant (eds.) Toward a typology of European languages (Empirical approaches to Language Typology), 8, 141-163.
Diller, A. V. N. (1988). Thai Syntax and "National Grammar". Language Sciences, 10(1), 273-312.
Duffley, P. (2003). The Gerund and the to-Infinitive as Subject. Journal of English Linguistics, 31(4), 324-352.
Gawelko, M. (2005). Quelques particularités de l'infinitif en espagnol et en portugais. Estudios hispánicos, 13(1), 167-176.
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409.
Haspelmath, M. (1989). From Purposive to infinitive – A universal path of grammaticization. Lingüística Histórica, 10(1), 287-310.
Hernanz Carbó, M. L. (1982). El infinitivo en español. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
Iturrioz Leza, J. L. (2000). Diversas aproximaciones a la nominalización. De las abstracciones a las macrooperaciones textuales. Función, 21-24(1), 31-140.
Mayerthaler, W., Fliedl, G. & Winkler. C. (2001). Infinitivprominenz in Europäischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Projektbericht.
McEnery, A. & Xiao, Z. (2005). HELP or HELP to: what do corpora have to say? English Studies, 86(2), 161-187.
Quintero Ramírez, S. (2012). Análisis contrastivo del infinitivo en español y en francés desde una perspectiva morfosintáctica. Lengua y Habla, 16(1), 150-171.
Raible, W. (2001). Linking Clauses. In Haspelmath König, Oesterreicher & Raible (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals - Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien - La Typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques. An International Handbook - Ein internationales Handbuch - Manuel international, 590-617.
Rémi-Giraud, S. (1988). L’infinitif. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Sasse, H. J. (2001). Scales between nouniness and verbiness. In Haspelmath König, Oesterreicher & Raible (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals - Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien - La Typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques. An International Handbook - Ein internationales Handbuch - Manuel international, 495-509.
Schybsbye, K. (1965). A Modern English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tesnière, L. (1976). Elementos de la sintaxis estructural. Madrid: Gredos.
Turner, N. (2000). Linguistique contrastive et traduction, étude contrastive de l’infinitif en français et en anglais. Paris: Ophrys.
Ylikoski, J. (2003). Defining non-finites: action nominals, converbs and infinitives. SKY Journal of Linguistics 16(1), 185-237.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.182
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.