Simple Versus Complex Stems in Multiple-choice Tests and their Effects on Students’ Performance

Nader Zarza, Nabeel Abedalazeez

Abstract


Multiple-choice tests are used to assess learning outcomes in variety of disciplines. They are comprised from two main parts: stem and options (distractors). Stem, by conveying information and fore heading the problem to be answered plays a vital role in any multiple-choice test. Although there are large bodies of studies to design options in these kinds of tests, constructing stem items has received too little attention.  Accordingly, much of current debate in constructing test items revolves around designing and building proper multiple-choice test options. This study tries to investigate the effect of item stem structure on students’ performance in order to choose structure in designing stems in favor of students’ high performance.

 


Keywords


Multiple-choice test, item-writing, stem

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ascalon, M. E., Meyers, L. S., Davis, B. W., & Smits, N. (2007). Distractor similarity and item-stem structure: Effects on item difficulty. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(2), 153-170.

Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL quarterly, 26(2), 345-374.

Collins, J. (2006). Education techniques for lifelong learning - Writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules. Radiographics, 26(2), 543.

Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (2000). Measurement and evaluation in teaching: Macmillan New York.

Haladyna, T. M. (1999). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items: L. Erlbaum Associates (Mahwah, NJ).

Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1989a). A taxonomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(1), 37-50.

Harris, D. P., & Palmer, L. (1970). A comprehensive English language test for speakers of English as a second language: listening: McGraw-Hill.

Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English language test. New York, NY: Longman.

Khodadady, E. (1999). Multiple choice stems in testing: Practice and theory. Tehran, Iran: Rahnama.

Osterlind, S. J. (2005). Creating quality multiple choice questions. Retrieved from http://www.ecdledg.com/news/Edvoece-arc-05.10-06.learn-34k

Parker, K., & Chaudron, C. (1987). The effects of linguistic simplifications and elaborative modifications on L2 comprehension. UHWPESL, 6(2), 1.

Passmore, C., Dobbie, A. E., Parchman, M., & Tysinger, J. (2002). Guidelines for constructing a survey. Research Series, 34(4), 281-286. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from www.stfm.org/fmhub/fm2002/apro2/rs1.pdf.

Ying-hui, H. (2007). An investigation into the task features affecting EFL listening comprehension test performance. Asian EFL Journal, 8(2), 1-15. Retrieved December 19, 2007, from http://www.asian-edf-journal.com/june_06_hyh.php_54k.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.237

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.